SAFe vs. Spotify - News, tips & guidance for agile, development, Atlassian-Software (JIRA, Confluence, Bitbucket, ...) and Google Cloud (2024)

Scaled Agile. What is it? Is there only one path to achieve it? Who’s using it?

When one considers the large scope of most projects undertaken by organizations at an Enterprise-scale - multiple departments, hundreds or possibly even thousands of employees - even to a casual bystander, it would seem unlikely the tenets of Agile via Scrum would be effective without some modifications. Let us introduce you to the practice of Scaled Agile and two approaches to it; Scaled Agile Framework®, or SAFe®, and the Spotify Model.

Origins and A History In Brief

Scaled Agile is an approach that at its core, regardless of the specific methodology, is a set of principles, processes, and best practices that allows larger organizations to adopt agile methodologies. This includes everything from Lean, Kanban to Scrum, accommodating the development and delivery of high-quality products and services at a faster rate.

SAFe®, or Scaled Agile Framework, had its first iteration when it was released in 2011. Its creators, Dean Leffingwell and Drew Jemilo worked to develop a methodology that differed from the project management practices of the day. The speed of change in market conditions and competition across many industries had far outpaced the capacity of those existing practices to adapt.

Similarly, the Spotify Model came into existence the following year when Henrik Kniberg and Anders Ivarsson collaborated to develop a lightweight framework working to eliminate the “silo effect” experienced by teams throughout larger organizations. In short, the Spotify Model could almost be compared to Scrum itself. It places an emphasis on the importance of culture and is implemented through Squads, Tribes, Chapters, and Guilds. The foundation of the model is the Squad and it acts essentially much like a Scrum team.

Peeling Back the Layers

In a nutshell, SAFe®, as its full name implies, relies more on a framework and very specific recommendations for implementation whereas the Spotify Model with its lighter approach typically works best when Agile coaches are involved as it can be trickier to implement. Certified SAFe® Program Consultants (SPC’s) and Release Train Engineer (RTE’s) coaches are the go-to assets for proper implementation of SAFe®.

The Spotify Model by comparison model isn’t a framework, rather it represents that organization’s view on scaling, from both a technical and cultural perspective. There is a focus more on organizing around work rather than following a specific set of practices. In traditional scaling frameworks, specific practices such as the daily standup are how the framework is implemented. However, in the Spotify model, the focus is on how the business can structure itself to enable agility. Autonomy is championed so that each team, or in their terminology, “Squad”, selects their own framework, for instance, Kanban or Scrum. Squads are further organized into Tribes and Guilds with the goals of keeping people aligned, not siloed, and allowing knowledge to be more easily shared.

Source: https://francois-nguyen.blog

Understand, it’s not that there is a clear winner in this comparison - what may work for one organization and their existing culture, may not for another. Both SAFe® and the Spotify Model each have their own advantages and disadvantages.

Walk With Me - Let’s Talk SAFe®

The present-day version of SAFe®, version 5, was released in January 2020, and is built around the Seven Core Competencies;

  • Lean-Agile Leadership
  • Team and Technical Agility
  • Agile Product Delivery
  • Enterprise Solution Delivery
  • Lean Portfolio Management
  • Organizational Agility
  • Continuous Learning Culture (https://www.scaledagileframework.com/about/, © Scaled Agile, Inc.)

Properly planned, SAFe® allows each organization its own unique implementation and configuration of the combined benefits of Agile, Lean, and DevOps frameworks. An organization-wide development process known as the Agile Release Train, or ART, which closely resembles the PDCA (Plan, Do, Check, Act or Adjust), sets and keeps the wheels in motion throughout the process; define, build, validate, release - repeated as needed.

SAFe® uses well-documented, specific, and repeatable processes. Agile and lean practices ensure all teams are focused on a common set of goals. Every individual understands what the deliverables are to be and as a result, the client has a clear set of expectations to be returned. There are a myriad of companies, large and small, all over the globe and across almost all industries, that have made SAFe® their standard. These include FedEx, Chevron, Nokia Software, American Express, Allianz, TV Globo, MetLife, Lockheed Martin, Bosch.

Achieving business agility and the benefits of Lean-Agile development at scale is not a trivial effort, so SAFe® is not a trivial framework. Before realizing SAFe®’s rewards, organizations must embrace a Lean-Agile Mindset as well as understand and apply Lean-Agile principles. They must identify Value Streams and Agile Release Trains (ARTs), implement a Lean-Agile portfolio, build quality in, and establish the mechanisms for continuous value delivery and DevOps. And, of course, the culture must evolve as well.”

Source: https://www.scaledagileframework.com/implementation-roadmap/
© Scaled Agile, Inc.

More than 20,000 organizations around the world and across a wide range of industries are using SAFe®. With a combination of increases in engagement by employees and higher levels of productivity, along with decreases in time-to-market and product defects, the transition to SAFe® for the majority of organizations has been a powerful one.

Source: https://scaledagile.com/what-is-safe/

“That’s A Wrap!”

With such a deep level of sophistication, detail, and simultaneous moving teams and respective activities, one would be reasonable to assume venturing into SAFe to be a substantial endeavor. While the level of complexity is indeed high, there are partners and solutions available to not only make the transition from Scrum to SAFe possible but rather, wholly successful and profitable.

In the end, both methods are designed to deliver exceptional value in a timely and efficient manner. Everyone at the organization, no matter their role or team, needs to work together under an overall umbrella of Agile methodology geared toward success. While the paths are slightly different, their destinations are the same.

SAFe®with Atlassian tools: Get to know Agile Hive now!

Would you like to know more aboutAgile Hiveand the software-supported implementation of SAFe®? We would be happy to discuss your requirements for enterprise-wide agile product development and product management with you. Take a look at ourImplementation Projectdocumentation to see an overview of what an implementation would entail.

Get in touch with us todayand let us demonstrate how it works in a personal session.

Further Reading

  • Implementing SAFe with software can be easy
  • Agile Hive Implementation Project
  • Scaled Agile: SAFe 5.0 changes and how Agile Hive maps them
  • SAFe with Atlassian tools: Agile Hive is a Scaled Agile Platform Partner

SAFe vs. Spotify - News, tips & guidance for agile, development, Atlassian-Software (JIRA, Confluence, Bitbucket, ...) and Google Cloud (3)SAFe vs. Spotify - News, tips & guidance for agile, development, Atlassian-Software (JIRA, Confluence, Bitbucket, ...) and Google Cloud (4)SAFe vs. Spotify - News, tips & guidance for agile, development, Atlassian-Software (JIRA, Confluence, Bitbucket, ...) and Google Cloud (5)

SAFe vs. Spotify - News, tips & guidance for agile, development, Atlassian-Software (JIRA, Confluence, Bitbucket, ...) and Google Cloud (2024)

FAQs

What is the difference between Spotify and SAFe Agile? ›

SAFe is a comprehensive framework for implementing agile at scale, Scrum of Scrums is a way to coordinate multiple Scrum teams, and the Spotify Model emphasizes experimentation and continuous improvement. It's important to choose the right framework for your organization based on your specific needs and goals.

How does Spotify use agile methodology? ›

At its core, the Spotify model assigns the following to each squad: Mission – what their main objective is and what shape the roadmap will take. Product owner – one who communicates product goals and vision and prioritizes tasks. Agile coach – guides the squad to stay productive and make efficient use of agile tools.

What is the Spotify model in Jira? ›

The Spotify model is a people-driven, autonomous framework for scaling agile. It stresses the importance of culture and networks and provides an example for dealing with multiple teams in a product development organization.

What are 4 levels of SAFe agile? ›

Considering the benefits of essential, large solution and portfolio, scaled Agile built a comprehensive level that will include all the four layers team, program, large solution, and portfolio.

What is the difference between Spotify and Scrum? ›

The model uses a 100% people-driven approach but is still not a framework. The primary difference between the scrum vs. Spotify model is “focus.” The scrum framework for teams emphasizes using specific practices to ensure the company, team members, and stakeholders are all on the same page to develop winning products.

Which framework is used in Spotify? ›

One UI, multiple containers. The Spotify Desktop client is a Windows and Mac native application that uses CEF (Chromium Embedded Framework) to display a web-based user interface.

What is the Agile organizational structure of Spotify? ›

The Spotify model structure is organized into Squads, Tribes (departments), Chapters, and Guilds. Squads are small, autonomous teams which concentrate on specific tasks or products as a means of agile work, which provide results more quickly.

What database system does Spotify use? ›

Spotify utilizes Apache Cassandra in its infrastructure to serve data behind a personalization algorithm, which recommends songs to its users. Spotify's data infrastructure is built on open-source Apache software platforms like Kafka, Storm, and Cassandra.

Why did the Spotify model fail? ›

In conclusion, the Spotify model has faced some criticism and failures due to its lack of contextualization, complexity, rigidity, resistance to change, and misalignment with business goals.

What are Spotify's KPI? ›

KPI Charts can assist in comparing the performance of Spotify with other music streaming services by providing a visual representation of key performance indicators. These could include metrics such as market share, customer acquisition costs, and subscriber growth.

How does Spotify use Apis? ›

Spotify Web API enables the creation of applications that can interact with Spotify's streaming service, such as retrieving content metadata, getting recommendations, creating and managing playlists, or controlling playback.

Is Spotify Tribe similar to SAFe? ›

Squads in the Spotify model are equivalent to Agile teams in SAFe, and Tribes in the Spotify model are a team of teams or agile release trains (ARTs) in the SAFe world.

What is the difference between SAFe agile and normal agile? ›

Agile principles emphasize self-organizing teams, fostering a culture of collaboration and autonomy. On the flip side, SAFe Agile introduces a structure with defined roles. This structure aims to streamline communication and decision-making in larger enterprise settings.

What is the difference between SAFe and Scrum agile? ›

Scrum: Primarily focuses on agile project management for small to medium-sized teams. SAFe: Designed to scale agile practices across the entire organization, including multiple teams, programs, and portfolios.

What is the difference between Six Sigma and SAFe agile? ›

Six Sigma uses statistical analysis and data-driven tools to identify and address process variations and defects, while Agile employs metrics and feedback to track progress, identify bottlenecks, and improve project outcomes.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Lakeisha Bayer VM

Last Updated:

Views: 6135

Rating: 4.9 / 5 (69 voted)

Reviews: 92% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Lakeisha Bayer VM

Birthday: 1997-10-17

Address: Suite 835 34136 Adrian Mountains, Floydton, UT 81036

Phone: +3571527672278

Job: Manufacturing Agent

Hobby: Skimboarding, Photography, Roller skating, Knife making, Paintball, Embroidery, Gunsmithing

Introduction: My name is Lakeisha Bayer VM, I am a brainy, kind, enchanting, healthy, lovely, clean, witty person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.