Is A Fingerprint Evidence Enough For A Criminal Conviction? (2024)

In many movies and television shows, a defendant will be identified and subsequently convicted of a crime after a detective finds his or her fingerprints at a crime scene. However, fingerprints are often not enough by themselves to result in a conviction. Instead, fingerprint evidence is often presented as one piece of evidence rather than the only evidence against a defendant.

When detectives discover fingerprints at a crime scene, they are commonly used in investigations to identify potential suspects or persons of interest. However, because of their limitations, police officers and prosecutors will often want to find additional types of evidence to secure a conviction.

If an officer finds your fingerprints, they will connect you to the crime scene. However, there is no way for the police to determine how long your fingerprints have been there. Interpreting fingerprints to match them may also result in mistaken identification.

While fingerprints might not have the evidentiary strength of DNA evidence, they are still used in criminal cases. Fingerprints are generally considered to be reliable, and juries understand what they mean. Every person has a series of ridges on their fingers that are ostensibly theirs and no one else’s.

How Fingerprints are Matched to a Suspect?

Two principles inform prosecutors about how to handle fingerprint evidence. The first principle is that the friction ridge patterns on your fingertips will not change during your life. The second principle is that every person has a unique pattern of friction ridges, including identical twins.

Fingerprints are used by police offers to identify suspects. They match fingerprints by comparing the fingerprints they have in police files with those that are found at the scene of a crime. The FBI has a searchable database that law enforcement officers can use to try to match unknown fingerprints to those contained in the database. Your fingerprints might be on file for many different reasons.

For example, you might have to be fingerprinted to gain security clearance for a new job or professional licensure. You can also be fingerprinted when you are placed under arrest. Many parents have their children fingerprinted by their local police departments so that they can be identified if they are the victims of crimes. No matter how your fingerprints are taken, once they are entered into the fingerprint database, they will be used for comparison purposes.

Fingerprint experts sometimes disagree about the number of points that are needed before a fingerprint match can be declared. For example, some fingerprint experts believe that a match has been found based on 12 points while others require 20 points to declare a match.

Speak to Arizona Criminal Defense Attorney Arja Shah Now

We are Open and Available to answer any questions. Free consultations by phone or video chat. Shah Law has successfully defended over 3,000 clients. We are on your side!

How are Fingerprints Found at a Crime Scene?

The friction ridges of your fingertips have numerous sweat pores. Your fingertips contain a mix of sweat, dirt, and oil that can be left on smooth surfaces when you touch them. These substances can leave behind an impression of the friction ridges of your fingers on the surfaces that you touch. Police officers use special chemical powders to make fingerprints visible.

After dusting different surfaces at a crime scene, the visibility of any prints will depend on the porosity of the surface. However, computer enhancements allow detectives to extrapolate complete fingerprints from fragments, and lasers can read markings that would otherwise be invisible.

It is not possible to determine the age of fingerprints. In many cases, a criminal defendant will try to explain that their fingerprints might be at the crime scene because of an earlier visit than when the crime occurred.

Fingerprints are used to connect a suspect with a crime scene based on the theory that no two individuals have the same fingerprints. However, it is possible that the different points on your fingertips might match the prints of someone else in the world. While your entire fingerprint might not be exactly the same, enough points might match to result in the police connecting you to a crime even if you were not present.

A good defense attorney might hire a fingerprint expert to review and compare your fingerprints to those found at the crime scene to help in this type of situation.

When fingerprint evidence is a major part of a criminal case, the prosecution will normally hire fingerprint experts to testify at trial and explain how the matching process worked. Your defense attorney can also call a fingerprint expert to challenge the evidence presented by the prosecutor’s expert.

Is A Fingerprint Evidence Enough For A Criminal Conviction? (1)

Distinguishing Features of Fingerprint Evidence

When police rely on fingerprints to help to find a suspect for a crime, they normally pay the most attention to the fingerprints’ ridges and patterns. Regardless of how old you become, these areas of your fingerprints will remain the same. Fingerprint software might also identify more than one set of fingerprints that include similar details. However, these patterns will not be exact between two people.

Most complications arise when partial matches are found with incomplete fingerprints instead of entire marks. When this happens, a partial print will not offer too much help to the prosecutor’s case. Instead, the prosecutor will likely need much more conclusive evidence to present to the jury.

Law enforcement agencies are able to access the federal fingerprint database to try to match fingerprints and identify suspects or crime victims. The database increases the likelihood that some crimes will be solved.

What are the Limitations of Fingerprint Evidence?

In many cases, fingerprints found at crime scenes will not be matched to any known prints in a collection or database. This means that the suspect might not be identified through his or her fingerprints. Fingerprints might also result in someone being charged with a crime who is not the actual culprit.

For example, someone who lives in a home where a crime occurs will likely leave fingerprints throughout the residence even if he or she had nothing to do with what occurred.

Many perpetrators wear gloves when they commit crimes to prevent any fingerprints from being left behind. Others might clean the crime scene to avoid leaving this type of evidence behind. In these types of cases, fingerprints will not lead to a conviction of the perpetrators.

Another limitation is that fingerprints do not show any indications of their age and should not be considered viable evidence according to this article from the American Association for the Advancement of Science. If you happened to be in a room a decade ago, your prints might be found 10 years later when a crime in the same room is investigated. Having the help of a skilled criminal defense lawyer can help you to challenge any fingerprinting evidence that might be used against you in a criminal case.

Your attorney might try to determine when you might have left the prints. If you were never there, he or she might hire a fingerprint expert to demonstrate that the state’s match is inaccurate.

Get Immediate Help from a Criminal Defense Lawyer

While television shows might make you believe that all is lost when your fingerprints have been found at a crime scene, that is not necessarily true. If you have been charged with a crime based on your fingerprints at a crime scene, you should talk to an experienced criminal defense lawyer at the Shah Law Firm as soon as possible.

Your attorney can carefully analyze all of the facts and circ*mstances of your case to identify the available defenses. Call us today at 602.560.7408 to request an appointment.

Is A Fingerprint Evidence Enough For A Criminal Conviction? (2024)

FAQs

Is A Fingerprint Evidence Enough For A Criminal Conviction? ›

Interpreting fingerprints to match them may also result in mistaken identification. While fingerprints might not have the evidentiary strength of DNA evidence, they are still used in criminal cases. Fingerprints are generally considered to be reliable, and juries understand what they mean.

What is the biggest problem with fingerprint evidence? ›

Fingerprints Are Not Secure

This is one reason fingerprints have been easily planted in the scenes of a crime. People with grievances against others can decide to extract their fingerprints and plant them in the scenes of crime. This is a major flaw of fingerprint identification that has been noticed for years.

What are the limitations of using fingerprints as evidence? ›

For example, prints can be smudged or distorted during the lifting process or they may be contaminated by other prints or substances at the crime scene. In such cases, it can be difficult to determine the authenticity of the prints, which can compromise their reliability as evidence in court.

Should fingerprint evidence be admissible in court? ›

Fingerprints are strong and reliable evidence, but must be connected to the time of the crime to be relevant. This requirement can be satisfied by showing the defendant did not have another opportunity to leave the prints because, for example, he had never been inside the victim's house before.

Has there ever been a conviction on fingerprint evidence? ›

In the eyes of the court, they were right; Hiller's murder would lead to the first conviction using fingerprint evidence in a criminal trial in the United States. At times controversial, this method of solving cases endures more than a century later.

How strong is fingerprint evidence? ›

Even though fingerprints are commonly used as tools in the investigation of crimes by law enforcement, the identification of a person through fingerprint analysis is not completely reliable, and the use of fingerprints without any other forms of corroborating evidence may result in wrongful convictions.

Is fingerprint enough to convict a suspect? ›

Fingerprints Can Identify, But Not Necessarily Convict

It does not mean they are accused of a crime. Another benefit of fingerprinting, outside criminal justice contexts, is the establishment of an emergency means of identification.

How reliable is fingerprint analysis? ›

It turns out that there's room for error. One accuracy study found that analysts make false positive matches (saying two prints are the same when they're not) in 0.1% of cases. That may seem pretty good, but it can be a huge problem when an innocent person is wrongfully convicted of a crime based on a false match.

What type of information cannot be obtained from a fingerprint? ›

An examiner cannot tell how long a print has been on a surface or under what circ*mstances it was placed there.

What is the error rate for fingerprints? ›

In this study, 125 fingerprint agencies completed a mandatory proficiency test that included two pairs of CNMs. The false-positive error rates on the two CNMs were 15.9% (17 out of 107, 95% C.I.: 9.5%, 24.2%) and 28.1% (27 out of 96, 95% C.I.: 19.4%, 38.2%), respectively.

How often are fingerprints used to solve crimes? ›

Broader use for latent prints

In 2019, the CBI had an Automated Fingerprint Identification System hit rate of 30%. In 2022, the hit rate was 38%. As of this year, the hit rate is 44%.

Can there be false positives of fingerprints? ›

A false positive error occurs when an examiner concludes that two prints share a common source when, in fact, they do not. This error is captured by judgments in cell B. A false negative error occurs when an examiner concludes that two prints do not share a common source when, in fact, they do.

What type of evidence is a fingerprint considered? ›

Physical evidence is comprised of those forms of data that can be measured or quantified. Examples include fingerprints, accelerants, hair or fibers, etc.

Is fingerprint evidence foolproof? ›

While well-trained forensic experts can be highly accurate, they are far from infallible. Studies have shown that even experienced examiners can make errors when comparing fingerprints, and their decisions can be influenced by cognitive biases and contextual information about the case.

How infallible are fingerprints? ›

Crime shows like Dateline or NCIS portray fingerprint analysis as an exact science. There's a print found, and if it is matched to a suspect, there is no doubt about its accuracy. The U.S. judicial system also treats fingerprint identification with the same absolute certainty.

How long do fingerprints last on evidence? ›

A: There is no scientific way to know how long a latent fingerprint will last. Fingerprints have been developed on surfaces that had not been touched in over forty years; yet not developed on a surface that was handled very recently. There are a multitude of factors that effect how long fingerprints last.

What is the problem with fingerprint scanning? ›

Here are some steps to help you troubleshoot fingerprint scanning issues: Clean the fingerprint sensor: A dirty or smudged fingerprint sensor or cutting – edge fingerprint sensor can cause issues. Gently clean the sensor with a soft cloth and avoid using any chemicals or abrasive materials.

What are the major problems in DNA fingerprinting? ›

Sample contamination, faulty preparation procedures, and mistakes in interpretation of results are major sources of error in DNA fingerprinting.

What are the negatives of fingerprinting? ›

Environmental factors such as dirt, grease, or moisture can affect the quality of fingerprints and make them difficult to read. Fingerprints can change over time due to factors such as aging, injury, or disease, which can make it difficult to match them accurately to previous records.

What is the most common mistake in fingerprinting? ›

Two important types of errors are false positive errors and false negative errors. A false positive error occurs when an examiner concludes that two prints share a common source when, in fact, they do not.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Kerri Lueilwitz

Last Updated:

Views: 6080

Rating: 4.7 / 5 (67 voted)

Reviews: 90% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Kerri Lueilwitz

Birthday: 1992-10-31

Address: Suite 878 3699 Chantelle Roads, Colebury, NC 68599

Phone: +6111989609516

Job: Chief Farming Manager

Hobby: Mycology, Stone skipping, Dowsing, Whittling, Taxidermy, Sand art, Roller skating

Introduction: My name is Kerri Lueilwitz, I am a courageous, gentle, quaint, thankful, outstanding, brave, vast person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.